Tuesday, May 09, 2006

Top Ten Things to Know About DeVos

I was googling the internet and came across an article about Dick DeVos on the Political Affairs website, which is a publication of the Communist Party. I hesitated to post this because of the emotional response "Communist" elicits in people; however, the magazine states they write stories from a working man's point of view and, more importantly, the article is well-researched and backed up with sources from major newspapers and organizations. So, I decided the information was worth sharing with Michigan voters who are capable of forming their own opinions and doing their own research about things they read.
DeVos' real record shows that he has absolutely nothing in common with Michigan's working families and poor people. ... Here are ten things you need to know about Rich "Dick" DeVos.

1. DeVos has financial and personal ties to Tom DeLay and the Republican culture of corruption. DeVos and his political action committee (PAC), Restoring the American Dream, exchanged thousands of dollars with DeLay and his PACs in 1999 and 2000. ... DeLay held his first Republican Majority Issues Committee fundraiser on DeVos' private yacht in 1999, an event also attended by convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff. DeVos also donated $5,000 to DeLay's legal defense fund last year. (sources: Federal Election Commission, Washington Post)

2. DeVos believes in cutting jobs. As head of Amway, Dick DeVos laid off nearly 1,400 people in Michigan between 1998 and 2000. Three years later, DeVos' company announced plans to increase investments by more than $200 million in its manufacturing and distribution facilities overseas. (Detroit Free Press, Grand Rapids Business Journal).

3. DeVos gets richer while Michigan workers suffer. DeVos supports "free trade" agreements like NAFTA. He has used his personal wealth to support publicity campaigns and lobbying efforts to convince the public and members of Congress that "free trade" agreements are good for workers. As of July 2005, NAFTA had cost Michigan over 63,000 jobs (Economic Policy Institute). DeVos' efforts played a big role in making that happen.

4. DeVos dishonestly fought Michigan's minimum wage increase. At a campaign event last October, DeVos parroted a slew of tired anti-minimum wage myths. "Most minimum wage jobs are part time," he proclaimed. He also said, "[If] you raise it, you end up losing jobs," and added that "a lot [minimum wage workers] are kids coming out of schools." DeVos' misleading comments show that he doesn't understand or care about the people who work at minimum wage jobs. In reality, most minimum-wage workers are people with families who are hurting economically because people like DeVos use their wealth and power to block their chances at a better life. According to the non-partisan Economic Policy Institute (EPI), 54% of the country's minimum wage workers earn more than half of their household's income. About 75% are adults over 20. Almost 800,000 are single mothers, and 1.8 million households in the US would receive a raise if the minimum wage were raised to $7.25 nationally. ...

5. DeVos despises Michigan's public schools. This is no exaggeration. DeVos was the main financial backer and chair of a failed 2000 anti-public school voucher ballot initiative in Michigan that was basically a scheme to cut funding for public education. He is a staunch advocate for privatization and in a 2002 speech to the ultra-conservative Heritage Foundation declared, "When the time comes, we will bring the fight back to Michigan again." Furthermore, DeVos, while serving on the State Board of Education (before abruptly quitting after two years of an 8-year term), advocated handing over public education resources to private corporations, thereby undermining Michigan's public schools. He personally financed the Education Freedom Fund, an organization of anti-public school advocates, by lavishing hundreds of thousands of dollars on it in the 1990s. Undoubtedly DeVos' investments in K12 Inc., an educational corporation that provides materials for private schools, would see solid returns if he could successfully undermine Michigan's public schools. [Emphasis added.] (Booth Newspapers, Center for Media and Democracy, AP)

6. DeVos supports the failed Republican ideology of tax cuts for the rich and deregulation. DeVos has personally benefited from deregulation of the energy and education sectors and the weakening of federal trade standards and state and federal environmental laws. Since 1990, successive Republican administrations and Republican-controlled state legislatures have aggressively passed tax cuts and deregulation in Michigan. DeVos and the Republicans insist these policies create jobs and strengthen the economy. Unfortunately, in reality, the result has been disastrous. As a result of such Republican policies, Michigan unemployment remains more than 2 points higher than the national average. Rather than creating jobs, tax cuts for the rich have made rich folk like DeVos wealthier, while forcing Michigan and its cities to make hard choices about the public services people care deeply about and need: schools, health care, roads, environmental conservation and clean-up, public transportation, water service, sanitation services, and on and on. (Detroit News, Center for Media and Democracy, San Francisco Chronicle, Michigan Department of Labor)

7. DeVos thinks large corporations shouldn't have to pay their fair share of Michigan's tax burden. DeVos wants to eliminate Michigan's Single Business Tax to benefit large companies like his own and shift an additional tax burden of $800 per year onto working families.

8. DeVos paid over $4 million for a $300 million corporate tax break. A tax loophole inserted into the 1997 federal budget bill benefited Amway to the tune of nearly $300 million. This tax giveaway was passed after Amway and the DeVos family had given $4.1 million to the Republican Party between 1991 and 1997. [Emphasis added.] (Common Cause)

9. DeVos secretly backs a dishonest campaign to repeal the estate tax. Since 1998, the DeVos family has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to help finance a campaign to repeal the estate tax, an effort led clandestinely by some of the countryƂ’s wealthiest families. They misleadingly claim that this tax affects millions of people, including family farms and small businesses. The truth is that only 1/4 of 1 percent of all estates will be subject to any estate tax this year, and these are owned by the richest families. ... (Public Citizen).

10. DeVos hides the truth about his wealth. So far DeVos is refusing to release his income tax returns. In a patronizing statement earlier this year on Michigan radio station WILX, DeVos said, "I will be disclosing to the people of Michigan that which I think is appropriate to understand."

[...] People have called Michigan's gubernatorial race a bellwether for the 2008 presidential race. Indeed, this is our chance to stop a candidate that poses a grave danger to working people in Michigan. If this race is a sign of things to come on the national political scene, it is also our chance to make a bold statement to the country that the anti-people politics of Republicans like DeVos, DeLay, Bush, and their cronies are now done for.
Michigan has suffered because of Republican policies that favor corporations and the rich at the expense of the poor and middle-class. DeVos is not the answer. He's part of the problem.

8 comments:

Lew Scannon said...

I think this outlines everything I don't like about Dick. Even more deceptive are his ads, which don't even label him a Republican, when he and his family have been major players in the party for years. If Michigan is hurting, it's because the Republicans have allowed jobs to be shipped overseas, only to make people like DeVos richer, while he pretends to come across as a friend of the working people. I believe this is all just a scam to get his privatization of public schools idea passed into law.

Tom Gagne said...

I think your initial instincts were correct. Not because of an emotional response, but because its ignorant, takes comments out of context, and insults the working-man's point of view by making it seem petty, shallow, and, well... uninformed.

You shouldn't have posted it because its poorly thought out, plays to prejudice, and misses every point it tries to make.

1. DeVos has financial and personal ties to Tomn DeLay and the Republican culture of corruption.

I doubt republicans own the franchise on corruption and only the shallowest of intellects would believe they do. I'm sure DeVos, like any wealthy and politcally-connect person, has attachments to all sorts of people, but to insinuate he's lying with dogs stretches credibility.

2. DeVos believes in cutting jobs.

Lots of business people are cutting jobs and sending them overseas to remain competitive and in business. Rather than thinking about it as cutting jobs people should think about it as preserving the jobs they're able to here. Better some keep their jobs at a profitable company than everyone lose them to an insolvent one.

3. DeVos gets richer while Michigan workers suffer.

The alternative to "free trade" is protectionism. The world's markets may not all treat the us fairly, but we remain competitive all the same because our people, technology, and proximity to the world's greatest economic engine all weigh heavily in our favor.

Of course, as long as anyone is "suffering" in Michigan anyone doing well does so while others "suffer". Though the statement is technically correct it doesn't take much (coming from a communist author?) to recognize the communist/socialist solution is for everyone to suffer.

4. DeVos dishonestly fought Michigans Minimum Wage

"..most minimum-wage workers are people with families who are hurting economically because people like DeVos use their wealth and power to block their chances at a better life." I'm curious what example there may of using wealth to bock chanes for a better life? This is simple "hate the rich" rhetoric. Everyone wants to be rich, but increasingly they want to do it through lotteries, lawsuits, or simply be provided for by others without taking risk or making the effort to become responsible for themselves. That is not why people risked crossing the Atlantic or what built this nation.

5 DeVos despises Michigan's public schools

He's probably in good company there. Lots of parents despise our schools, teaching toward the low-to-middle, and how much money is absorbed by administration. Lots of parents hate the teachers union because they see too many teachers that ought to be fired but can not, unless they actually commit a crime. Good work if you can get it.

6. Supports failed republican ideology of tax cuts for the rich and deregulation

How did tax cuts for the rich fail? One way, which has failed, to get the government to spend less money is to give it less money to spend in the first place. Unfortunately, the government did exactly what most Americans do when they can't afford what they want--they borrowed. This comments also suggests a lack of understanding on how taxes work.

As for deregulation, the comments needs to be more specific. Long distance? Local service? Electricity? Cable? Radio? Software monopolies?

7. Doesn't think large corporations shouldn't pay their fare share

This conclusion is incorrectly drawn from DeVos' support for the repeal of Michigan's Single Business Tax. A tax levied against all Michigan businesses (large and small) based on the number of employees they have, regardless whether or not the company made a profit. How would individuals like to be taxed whether they made money or not? It is the only tax like it in the country and puts Michgian at a disadvantage in attracting new business. By opposing the SBT DeVos demonstrates his compassion for the average working guy by making our state more attractive to new employers to provide more jobs. The logic is so simple it escapes understanding.

8 Devos paid $4 million for a $300 million corporate tax break

Did he break the law? Should companies not lobby for legislation that would benefit their business? Should teachers and farmers dissolve their lobbying efforts?

9 Backs dishonest compaign to repeal the estate tax

"You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means." — Inigo Mantoya, Princess Bride

Lots of people oppose the estate tax and none of them our dishonest. Income has already been taxed. Why should it be taxed again? Why should't parents be able to leave their progeny whatever they weren't able to spend, consume, or destroy before death? Why should their be a limit on what they leave behind? Why should a farmer not be able to leave a $67 million worth of land and equipment to his children? Why shouldn't the Vanderbilts? Why shouldn't the DeVos'? Why shouldn't any Joe?

10 Hides the truth about his wealth

Why not? I do. When republicans tried making a fuss over Kerry's wealth no one seemed to care. What happened to knowing people for the content of their character and not the content of their wallets?

Kathy said...

Thomas, thanks for stopping by and leaving your remarks. I'm not going to go down your list and comment on each point since we obviously have different perspectives. However, I have been researching some of the sources the author gave and I'll probably be doing some posting about them. The first one will deal with the estate tax.

I wanted to comment on this statement of yours though: What happened to knowing people for the content of their character and not the content of their wallets?

I agree that character is important and I'm not against wealth, but I am against greed, corruption and the manipulation that excessive money can buy.

I was also raised to believe that the company you keep is a good indicator of your character. DeVos is close with DeLay, Bush, Rove, and many other corrupt Republicans. This gang didn't simply become corrupt overnight - they've been buying and currying favors and votes for years - and DeVos has been buying favors along with the best of them. Is that morally honest? Average Americans can't buy favors from the government, let alone get the ear of the president.

I also believe money carries with it a moral obligation. Andrew Carnegie believed in the "Gospel of Wealth." He felt rich people had a moral obligation to give money back to others in society. Bill Gates also believes rich people have an obligation to pay back society for the opportunities society afforded them. In fact, Gates once said that he will only leave his children $10-20 million each when he dies and will give the rest to charity. His point was that his money had already provided them with good educations, opportunities, etc., and those things, along with their inheritance, should be plenty to give them a comfortable life.

So, I guess I'm saying I don't care too much for DeVos' character. A moral person would be worried about doing something for the common good. And I say that from my perspective as a Christian. The bible doesn't teach us to hoard money and become richer and richer. The bible teaches us to feed the hungry, cloth the naked and shelter the poor. DeVos is a Christian - he should know that.

Tom Gagne said...

"I was also raised to believe that the company you keep is a good indicator of your character."

First, I want it clear that I'm not a DeVos supporter, though I am socially and fiscally conservative.

Second, I'm curious what the definition of "close" is. I know lots of people and have attended parties together with them and I wouldn't want to be characterized as having kept "close" company with them. When people move around certain circles they run into people inside those same circles. Christ spent plenty of time with prostitutes and those lowest of the low, tax collectors, but his motives weren't to associate with them. I don't know what DeVos' motives may have been but I'm uncomfortable assasinating his reputation simply because he knows the guys.

Without being a party to the conversations can you be sure he was currying favor in a corrupt way, and not, perhaps, to improve prospects for his company and employees? Or perhaps something to benefit the Grand Rapids area? Or maybe getting money for the cancer center?

It really borders on the paranoid, don't you think?


I also believe money carries with it a moral obligation. Andrew Carnegie believed in the "Gospel of Wealth." He felt rich people had a moral obligation to give money back to others in society.

Ted Turner once complained he'd rather be listed as one of the world's most philanthropic rather than wealthiest. He then proceeded to give aggressively to charities.

Warren Buffet, on hearing the news, chastised Turner and told him the best use of his money was to invest in new businesses, employeeing more people, and giving hope and financial security to their families. You know, the whole teach-them-to-fish-rather-than-give-them-a-fish thing.

Knowing what the best use of other people's money is separates conservatives from other parties. Conservatives don't (or at least shouldn't) pretend to tell you what you should do with your money, even less, force you to do it. Other parties have endless agendas for other people's money.

Additionally, you don't know how much of his money he gives away, do you? He may give away a larger percentage than you, but chooses to anonymously wishing not to draw attention to himself.

So, I guess I'm saying I don't care too much for DeVos' character. A moral person would be worried about doing something for the common good. Because we're unfamiliar with his philanthropy he's stingy.

Matthew 6:1-4 warns about drawing attention to your own charity--but you already knew that.

Neil Shakespeare said...

Sounds like you better DeVorce DeVos...sorry...that was just so cheap!

Anonymous said...

theve taken money out of my school so we need some one new to put all! the money back in the schools.

Anonymous said...

why take the schools money and use it to pay for the govenment officials?

Tom Gagne said...

Who's taken money out of schools? Did I miss a posting?

Also, why do people think Michigan needs to spend more? Michigan is already in the top 10 of per-student spending. And according to a report from stateline.org called State of education: Who makes the grade?:

---
The report, "Quality Counts 2006," found that factors such as per-pupil spending and student demographics had less of an impact on student achievement than a state's history of raising expectations and standards.

"After more than a decade, it's fair to be asking whether the standards-based approach to education reform works. We're seeing pretty strong evidence that it does," said Education Week Research Director Christopher Swanson.
---