Tuesday, February 14, 2006

What Do Free Traders Think of This?

That's the question being posed by David Sirota about this article in the Buffalo News.
A company in the United Arab Emirates is poised to take over significant operations at six American ports as part of a corporate sale, leaving a country with ties to the Sept. 11 hijackers with influence over a maritime industry considered vulnerable to terrorism.

The Bush administration considers the UAE an important ally in the fight against terrorism since the suicide hijackings and is not objecting to Dubai Ports World's purchase of London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co.

The $6.8 billion sale is expected to be approved today. The British company is the fourth largest ports company in the world and its sale would affect commercial U.S. port operations in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.

Dubai Ports World said it won approval from a secretive U.S. government panel that considers security risks of foreign companies buying or investing in American industry.

How does this fit into Homeland Security plans to secure our borders? After Sept. 11, the FBI concluded that the UAE was an important operational and financial base for the hijackers who carried out the attacks against New York and Washington.
Sen. Charles Schumer, a Democrat whose district includes the New York port, urged the administration to consider the sale carefully.

"America's busiest ports are vital to our economy and to the international economy, and that is why they remain top terrorist targets," Schumer said. "Just as we would not outsource military operations or law enforcement duties, we should be very careful before we outsource such sensitive homeland security duties."

This is just inviting trouble. Apparently free trade and profits are more important than security and people.

UPDATE: Sen. Schumer was also on Fox Television voicing his concerns about this deal and asking if we should be outsourcing our own security.
"I think there ought to be a full and public review before this company is allowed to control security up and down the East Coast," he said. [Emphasis mine.]

"The issue is not the head of the company. I'm sure he's been checked out. But how good is their security? How good do they check on their employees? Could people infiltrate this company a lot more easily than they could infiltrate an American company?"

Why is Schumer the only one speaking out so far? Is everybody else on the Hill waiting till a WMD makes it through a port before they finally say something?

3 comments:

Kathy said...

The ports include New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia. From what I can ascertain, they would inspect cargo and be in charge of security - if I'm reading it correctly. I saw this mentioned in a Canadian paper too.

I agree, it's insane. The UAE may be an ally, but they stonewalled our government in trying to track Osama through his bank records.

Celestino. said...

Kathy in Michigan, I was looking through some blogs and I think you're absolutely right about what you mentioned: "Apparently free trade and profits are more important than security and people."
Many seem to forget that life on earth is short, and won't really care who lives or dies.

Kathy said...

Celestino, thanks for dropping by and leaving a comment. It is sad that we don't value life enough in this world.