Wednesday, February 08, 2006

Social Security Plan in New Budget

This Newsweek article by Allan Sloan highlights just how sneaky and conniving the Bush administration is.
Last year, even though Bush talked endlessly about the supposed joys of private accounts, he never proposed a specific plan to Congress and never put privatization costs in the budget. But this year, with no fanfare whatsoever, Bush stuck a big Social Security privatization plan in the federal budget proposal, which he sent to Congress on Monday.

His plan would let people set up private accounts starting in 2010 and would divert more than $700 billion of Social Security tax revenues to pay for them over the first seven years.

If this comes as a surprise to you, have no fear. You're not alone. Bush didn't pitch private Social Security accounts in his State of the Union Message last week...

Nevertheless, it's here. Unlike Bush's generalized privatization talk of last year, we're now talking detailed numbers. On page 321 of the budget proposal, you see the privatization costs: $24.182 billion in fiscal 2010, $57.429 billion in fiscal 2011 and another $630.533 billion for the five years after that, for a seven-year total of $712.144 billion.

Bush wasted millions of dollars of taxpayer money flying all over the country last year pushing privatization. What did all of this show? That Americans overwhelmingly were against privatization and wanted Social Security strengthened - not privatized.

Once again, Bush and his administration show that they can't be trusted to govern according to the will of "the people."

5 comments:

Kvatch said...

Damnit! I knew Bu$hCo would try and sneak that in. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: I want out of all of this Social Security nonsense. Now!

Rex Kramer, Danger Seeker said...

Will of "the people?"

These are the same people who elected him; surely he has his finger firmly on their collective pulses, even if they themselves don't understand what's in their best interests.

Socking Cash into my Mattress,

Rex

abi said...

$700 billion diverted from social security funds? The baby boomers aren't going to like that.

I don't think the country is ready for the sight of tie-dyed, bell-bottomed 60- and 70-somethings shuffling down Pennsylvania Avenue, with their arthritic fingers clutching protest signs, and singing Kumbaya.

Kathy said...

It won't be baby boomers throwing the biggest ruckus - it will be the younger generations screaming when they have to take their elderly parents into their homes!

Kvatch said...

Kathy, just wanted to let you know that your post inspired me to finish one that I had waiting on the whole Ownership Society thing. Thanks for the inspiration.

K.